Can the Queen Put Harry’s Prince Title in Abeyance Like She Did with His HRH?
Current Standing: The Role of the Monarch vs. Parliament
As of August 2023, Prince Harry retains his title as Duke of Sussex, though he and his wife Meghan Markle have stepped back from royal duties. The situation regarding royal titles can be complex, particularly in the context of family dynamics and public sentiment.
The Queen, now deceased, cannot unilaterally act to abrogate Prince Harry’s title. This power lies with the British Parliament, which has the authority to grant and remove titles. The decision to grant the HRH (His/Her Royal Highness) style to Prince Harry was made by the Monarch, but it can also be rescinded through legislative action. The HRH indicates the person's capacity to act on behalf of the Monarch and, by extension, the monarch of associated realms.
Post-Step Back: Who Has the Final Authority?
After stepping back, Prince Harry lost the authority to act as a representative of the Monarch, which led to the loss of the HRH style. The various military honorary titles that he received due to performing royal duties were also returned to the monarchy and reassigned. The retention of the title "Prince" as a family title means it remains until a formal disownment by the family, which would likely involve parliamentary action, especially given Harry’s status as a member of the line of succession.
Currently, the authority to make any decisions regarding Prince Harry’s titles lies with King Charles III. While the King retains the power to retain or rescind titles, the stance adopted seems to be based on the pragmatic consideration that Harry is no longer resident or engaged in official royal duties.
Public Opinion and Potential Changes
There are growing appeals from individuals for the King to remove Harry’s titles, driven by public sentiment. Many strongly disapprove of Harry's actions and statements. However, it is important to note that public opinion, while influential, does not overrule constitutional matters. The change of title, if it occurs, is more likely to come from a formal announcement by the royal family or the monarch.
King Charles III appears to be adhering to the principle that retaining the titles would be seen as a petty act, given Harry’s diminished role and absence from the U.K. The King’s decision to defer to maintaining the status quo aligns with the broader interests of the royal house and the dignity expected of a constitutional monarch.
It is likely that any significant changes will come through parliamentary involvement, especially if the tide of public opinion shifts sufficiently. This could mean a formal process of disownment from the line of succession, which would involve parliamentary action in multiple realms where Harry holds titles.
In conclusion, while Prince Harry retains his title for now, any changes to his title would require further action from the British Parliament and the royal family. The current stance is in line with the constitutional framework and takes into account the balance of royal family dynamics and public expectations.