Is Lavish Living of Spiritual Gurus Justified?
One often wonders whether the lavish lifestyle of spiritual gurus like Sri Sri Ravi Shankar and others is appropriate or justified. While the idea of renunciation and asceticism is deeply rooted in spiritual traditions, the modern world questions whether luxury should be a part of a spiritual leader's life.
It's true that saints and spiritual leaders are often seen as guardians of the spiritual realm, guiding humanity towards enlightenment and inner peace. However, does renouncing worldly pleasures mean their lives should be bare and unlivable? Can a spiritual leader live a life that is both comfortable and conducive to their mission without compromising their principles?
Defining Lavish Living
The term "lavish" is often associated with excess and opulence. However, in the context of spiritual living, a lavish life could mean a lifestyle that brings 'bliss' and comfort to the soul. Enlightened saints, whether spiritual leaders or sages, lead a life of privilege, but not for show.
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, a prominent example, leads an extraordinary life. He has been reported to eat once a day, travel in an innova (a modest vehicle), and work tirelessly for 20 hours a day. Despite the luxury and comfort, his dedication to his mission remains unshaken. He works well into the night, responding to emails from followers across the globe, and wakes up early to begin his day.
The Justification for Lavish Living
There are valid reasons why some spiritual leaders live a life of luxury. When these leaders are entrusted with significant resources, it is often justified to provide them with the means to carry out their missions effectively. Providing the necessary funds and resources can help them serve humanity more efficiently and bring their message of peace and enlightenment to a wider audience.
However, the justification must be universal. If a spiritual leader's lavish lifestyle is perceived as a commercial venture, its sanctity is compromised. Spiritual growth and wisdom should not be sold at an exorbitant price. A small fee is acceptable, but charging heavily for spiritual teachings might be seen as exploiting the followers' devotion and naivety.
Detachment and Enlightenment
Many spiritual teachers, like ancient sages, practice detachment from materialism. They focus on sharing ancient, timeless wisdom rather than accumulating wealth. Their teachings and techniques are meant to liberate the soul and awaken consciousness, not to enrich the teacher.
Enlightened beings are often detached from the duality of nature and are beyond the material world. They freely share spiritual techniques and wisdom because they see no value in personal wealth. Their goal is to help others reach a state of enlightenment, not to profit from it.
Furthermore, spiritual techniques and methods for enlightenment are not exclusive. Techniques like meditation are profound and universal, providing the same benefits regardless of the practitioner. These methods are not meant to be sold but to be shared for the greater good.
The Siri Aurobindo Organization (AOL)
One particular aspect of concern is the heavy fees charged by organizations like Siri Aurobindo Organization (AOL) for their courses, which could be offered free of charge or for a minimal fee. The perception that these teachings should be accessible to all without financial barriers is a legitimate one. Charging excessively can mistakenly be perceived as a commercial operation, which undermines the spiritual integrity of these teachings.
The question remains: what's the difference between a political leader using taxpayer money for luxury and a spiritual guru using donated funds for the same purpose? Shouldn't the latter be held to a higher moral standard?
In conclusion, while it might seem contradictory, a lavish lifestyle can be justified when it serves the greater good and is not motivated by personal gain. The true measure of a spiritual leader is not in their material lifestyle but in their authenticity, dedication, and ability to guide others towards enlightenment.