Do Democrats Ever Speak About the US Constitution?

The United States Constitution is a cornerstone document that has shaped American society since its ratification. However, the way this document is interpreted and discussed can vary significantly among political factions. While many Democrats and scholars of American history are acutely aware of the efforts to redefine and corrupt the original meanings of the Constitution, particularly the 2nd Amendment, Republicans often take a more selective approach to its application.

Interpreting the Constitution: Original Meanings vs. Modern Interpretations

Democrats and Original Intentions: It is widely recognized among many Democrats and knowledgeable scholars that attempts are made to reinterpret key phrases in the Constitution. For instance, terms such as “well-regulated militia,” “free State,” “keep and bear arms,” and “infringe” often get redefined in ways that deviate from their original English meanings. The 2nd Amendment, in particular, is frequently discussed in these terms. Despite the fact that it was drafted and ratified by hundreds of literate citizens, there is no historical evidence suggesting that the authors intended to communicate two different, unrelated meanings. Some Democrats and legal scholars argue that these provisions should be interpreted within their historical context, preserving their original intent.

Republicans and the Constitution

Selective Use as a Prop: Republicans often use the Constitution as a symbolic prop, much like a flag, but they frequently avoid a deep engagement with its original principles. Instead, they may invoke the Constitution selectively, particularly when it aligns with their current political positions. This selective use can lead to a misinterpretation of the Constitution, as it is not uncommon for Republicans to hide behind it in the mistaken belief that it will absolve them of unconstitutional or unlawful acts. However, the very nature of the Constitution is to serve as a guide for future development and progress, rather than as a static, unchangeable document.

The Role of Law and Progress

Both Democrats and Republicans agree that laws and institutions must evolve alongside the progress of human thought and knowledge. The passage from The Federalist Papers quoted above by James Madison highlights this idea. Madison stated that while moderate imperfections are sometimes necessary and can be tolerated, the Constitution and societal laws must adapt as new discoveries and truths emerge, and as societal norms and values evolve. This sentiment underscores the importance of a living constitution, one that can accommodate the changing circumstances of society.

Original The Federalist Passage:

"I am certainly not an advocate for frequent and untried changes in laws and constitutions. I think moderate imperfections had better be borne with because when once known we accommodate ourselves to them and find practical means of correcting their ill effects. But I know also that laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed more enlightened as new discoveries are made new truths disclosed and manners and opinions change with the change of circumstances institutions must advance also and keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."

Madison’s words remind us that the Constitution is a dynamic document that should evolve with society. It is a tool for guiding progress, not a rigid blueprint that should be rigidly adhered to at all costs.

Conclusion

The interpretation of the US Constitution is a complex issue that continues to be debated in political and legal circles. While Democrats are often vocal about preserving the original meanings of constitutional provisions, Republicans may be more selective in their application of the document. However, both sides agree that laws and institutions need to evolve with the progress of society. The Constitution, as intended, is a living document that can adapt to new discoveries and changing social norms, ensuring that American democracy continues to thrive.