Determining the Quality of Modern Art in the Digital Age

How is the Quality of Modern Art Determined?

The determination of quality in modern art is a multifaceted and subjective process that varies significantly based on the perspective and interpretation of the viewer. In the contemporary art landscape, quality can often be gauged through the reactions of influential art dealers, gallery sales, and the appeal of the work in online platforms such as art fairs. However, ultimately, the core of art's quality lies in the personal and collective reception of the viewer.

Subjective Perspective and Personal Reception

The intrinsic value of art is determined by the individual's perception and emotional response to the piece. Whether one finds a work of art to be high quality can be pinpointed by simple yet profound criteria: if the viewer is moved, inspired, or emotionally resonates with the work, it is considered excellent art. Conversely, if a work fails to evoke any such feeling, it may be deemed of lower quality by the same individual.

Objective Parameters and Mastery

Navigating the subjective realm, one must acknowledge the objective standards that also determine the quality of modern art. These parameters include:

Technical Mastery: Both the artist's command of the medium and the technical skills employed are vital. Relevance of Ideas: The artwork should engage with contemporary issues and experiences, contributing to a dialogue of its time. Aesthetic and Expressive Impact: The piece should have an immediate aesthetic appeal or an expressive quality that speaks to the viewer without the need for specialized knowledge or symbolism.

Good art transcends temporal boundaries and remains relevant across different eras. However, contemporary art, specifically art of the 21st century, can be particularly challenging to decode and appreciate. While it requires a certain 'test of time' to fully reveal its significance, some works may garner immediate attention and a strong following, while others may take years to gain recognition and understanding.

Marketplace Acceptance and Curatorial Opinions

The ultimate arbiter of modern art's quality is the response of the informed marketplace. This marketplace can be multifaceted, including:

Museum Attendance: The interest and turnout for exhibitions and museum visits can indicate cultural significance and art quality. Artist Galleries: Sales and the level of interaction with the art by interested collectors provide a practical measure of perceived quality. Private Collectors: The willingness of collectors to invest in and support the artist and their work is a testament to the perceived value and quality.

At the heart of the process, a strong market presence is necessary. For an artist to gain traction, there must be a believer who invests in the work. This could mean a curator, a collector, or even an admirer who champions the artist through purchases and exhibition support.

Conclusion

The quality of modern art is a combination of personal and objective factors. While art can be evaluated through technical proficiency and relevance, its ultimate quality often comes down to the collective response and resonance it achieves within the discerning and diverse global art community.