Are Real Things Literally Real?

The distinction between what is ldquo;realrdquo; and what is not has long been a subject of philosophical debate. In this article, we will explore the nature of reality, focusing on the concept of real things and their literal existence.

Numbers and Numerals: A Case Study in Reality

Numbers, while often discussed in the context of reality, are themselves a representation of a concept rather than an intrinsic object. Numerals, the symbols we use to represent numbers, can be adjusted and manipulated based on the context. However, the essence of the number remains unchanged; it still represent a quantity of things.

For instance, consider The Count holding a styrofoam symbol. Whether this symbol represents the number 3, 7, or 9, the fundamental reality is that it is still one piece of styrofoam. Similarly, a foot is a measure of distance, conceptualized in the human mind but not physically tangible. One foot is 12 inches, but this measurement does not physically exist outside of our minds, yet it remains a real and useful concept.

The Definition of ldquo;Realrdquo;

A real thing is inherently real by definition. This concept aligns with the most useful and common understanding of what it means for something to be real. However, the precise nature of that reality can be subject to debate. For example, unicorns are not real in the strictest sense since they do not exist in nature, yet they can exist in our thoughts and imagination. Therefore, the thought of a unicorn can be considered real in a conceptual sense.

In essence, something is real to the extent that it can be verified through multiple and consistent means within the bounds of our senses and mutual agreement. This is generally what we mean when we talk about reality: something that can be observed and shared by others. However, deciding what counts as ldquo;realrdquo; can sometimes be nuanced and context-dependent.

Empirical vs. Literal Reality

The concept of reality is often tied to empirical testing. Empirical reality refers to that which can be directly observed, measured, and tested. However, empirical testing does not explain everything, and there are instances where naturalistic explanations fall short. This highlights the distinction between the literal world, which follows empirical laws, and the metaphorical or theoretical world.

For instance, phenomena that do not fit neatly into the current understanding of natural laws, such as consciousness or quantum mechanics, challenge our everyday notions of empirical reality. The literal understanding of something is the stark, unembellished truth of its existence, without the layers of metaphor or interpretation that often surround it.

Conversely, the metaphysical world is one that operates beyond direct empirical observation, often relying on philosophical or theoretical frameworks. While the metaphysical world cannot be directly tested, it can still be considered real in a conceptual or intellectual sense. The literal world, on the other hand, is governed by a clear set of rules and can be empirically tested.

Conclusion

The question of whether real things are literally real can be complex and multifaceted. It requires a working understanding of both empirical reality, which is tested and observable, and the concept of literal reality, which remains distinct and unambiguous. These concepts, while seemingly simple, delve into deep philosophical and scientific questions about the nature of existence and perception.